[Rdap] CrossRef or Other DOIs for Data Sets

Ruth Duerr ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 00:40:40 EDT 2016


CrossRef metadata is not the same as DataCite metadata and Nature publishing group requires that data be available to reviewer’s, so you must tell them what the data is.  If you give them a CrossRef DOI they will say it is not data.  The BCO-DMO data center is currently having this issue, though they are working to resolve the issue pretty hard.

> On Sep 18, 2016, at 7:57 PM, David Palmer <davidpalmer00 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> How to understand Nature's dislike of CrossRef DOI?  Presumably the author has included the CrossRef DOI in his article for his research data.  So at this point how does the CrossRef metadata on the research data DOI come into play?
> 
> thanks
> David Palmer
> University of Hong Kong
> 
>  
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:22:05 -0600
> From: Ruth Duerr <ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com <mailto:ruth.duerr3 at gmail.com>>
> To: "Research Data, Access and Preservation" <rdap at asis.org <mailto:rdap at asis.org>>
> Cc: "rdap at mail.asis.org <mailto:rdap at mail.asis.org>" <rdap at mail.asis.org <mailto:rdap at mail.asis.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Rdap] CrossRef or Other DOIs for Data Sets
> Message-ID: <F0C9E4E9-B47E-4FAB-8C3C-B0E3218A3879 at gmail.com <mailto:F0C9E4E9-B47E-4FAB-8C3C-B0E3218A3879 at gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> But it should be noted that some publisher's, most notably the Nature Publishing Group, does not like accepting articles where the data cited uses a Cross-ref DOI, just due to the metadata issue (no comment on the justifiability of that).
> 
> Ruth
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> > On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Hutchinson, Alvin <HUTCHINSONA at si.edu <mailto:HUTCHINSONA at si.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone feel strongly about using (or not using) a certain flavor of DOI for research data sets?
> >
> > We are the CrossRef registration agency for the Smithsonian and we?ve been doing publications for years but lately have been approached by scientists who want a DOI both for link permanence and citability.
> >
> > Would anyone recommend against using CrossRef in favor of another DOI type? And if so, which one(s)?
> >
> >
> > Please pardon my ignorance and let me know if there?s something obvious I am missing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alvin
> >
> >
> > Alvin Hutchinson
> > Smithsonian Libraries
> > 202.633.1031 <tel:202.633.1031>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Rdap mailing list
> Rdap at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/rdap

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kunverj.com/pipermail/rdap/attachments/20160918/e9f94573/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RDAP mailing list