[Rdap] CrossRef or Other DOIs for Data Sets

[Ruth Duerr]

But it should be noted that some publisher's, most notably the Nature Publishing Group, does not like accepting articles where the data cited uses a Cross-ref DOI, just due to the metadata issue (no comment on the justifiability of that).

Ruth

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Hutchinson, Alvin <HUTCHINSONA at si.edu> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone feel strongly about using (or not using) a certain flavor of DOI for research data sets?
>  
> We are the CrossRef registration agency for the Smithsonian and we’ve been doing publications for years but lately have been approached by scientists who want a DOI both for link permanence and citability.
>  
> Would anyone recommend against using CrossRef in favor of another DOI type? And if so, which one(s)?
>  
>  
> Please pardon my ignorance and let me know if there’s something obvious I am missing.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Alvin
>  
>  
> Alvin Hutchinson
> Smithsonian Libraries
> 202.633.1031
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Rdap mailing list
> Rdap at mail.asis.org
> http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/rdap
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kunverj.com/pipermail/rdap/attachments/20160913/cc8cdf87/attachment-0001.html>